Sunday, December 21, 2014
Not politics, mince pies
We used to have these every year at Christmas growing up. At one point I had my grandmother's recipe, but I don't know for sure what has become of it. So I had to root around and find a recipe that sounded about like the ingredients that I used to have to shove through the meat grinder every fall. Every year I say I am going to make them, this year I did.
Friday, August 15, 2014
Well, that backfired
I received a flyer in the mail the other day from Uber, asking me to call my representative to complain about AB2293. Well I went to the state's website and read the text of the bill. I suggest you follow the link and read it for yourself, it is not very long. But this is what I got from it.
It you summon a ride on your Uber app, the car arrives and you get in, you will know that the driver is insured the way any other person offering transportation for hire is insured. And if Uber has not done their job, and the driver done not in fact have appropriate insurance, then Uber's insurance will cover you. Sounds pretty pro-consumer to me.
The business model of companies like Uber, and Postmates, whom I have written about earlier, is to classify the people who actually earn the money for them as independent contractors, putting all the risk on them.
I work as an independent contractor myself, and I choose to do that. But what I charge is a negotiated fee, it is not set by fiat of my client. I am required by my client to carry certain types of insurance, and have to produce certificates of insurance to demonstrate that I have them. And my client never tells me “Say this, not that” because they are pretending to be a different business that they are.
So I called my representative and I said, “If Uber is trashing you, then you must be doing something right.”
I like to go to Reno for a weekend every now and then. I have considered putting an add on Craigslist to see if I anyone around me would like to share gas in exchange for a ride. That is ride sharing. What Uber (and Lyft) are doing is running a taxi company. They have been calling it something else to avoid the responsibility (and corresponding expense) that comes with running a taxi company.
No, they don't have meters. But I have ridden in taxis that had no meters too. Years ago, I had occasion to take a cab in Washington DC, and they looked up their rates on a printed sheet. There was no meter, just a flat rate that you knew as soon as you got into the car. Sound familiar?
The only difference I can see between them and a taxi, is that they cannot be flagged down on the street. They are tied to the app for their income.
The thing that ticks me off about this business model is the sense of entitlement, that they are just too fucking precious to have to assume the responsibility for anyone or anything other than themselves, or to follow laws that everyone else has to follow.
Tweet
It you summon a ride on your Uber app, the car arrives and you get in, you will know that the driver is insured the way any other person offering transportation for hire is insured. And if Uber has not done their job, and the driver done not in fact have appropriate insurance, then Uber's insurance will cover you. Sounds pretty pro-consumer to me.
The business model of companies like Uber, and Postmates, whom I have written about earlier, is to classify the people who actually earn the money for them as independent contractors, putting all the risk on them.
I work as an independent contractor myself, and I choose to do that. But what I charge is a negotiated fee, it is not set by fiat of my client. I am required by my client to carry certain types of insurance, and have to produce certificates of insurance to demonstrate that I have them. And my client never tells me “Say this, not that” because they are pretending to be a different business that they are.
So I called my representative and I said, “If Uber is trashing you, then you must be doing something right.”
I like to go to Reno for a weekend every now and then. I have considered putting an add on Craigslist to see if I anyone around me would like to share gas in exchange for a ride. That is ride sharing. What Uber (and Lyft) are doing is running a taxi company. They have been calling it something else to avoid the responsibility (and corresponding expense) that comes with running a taxi company.
No, they don't have meters. But I have ridden in taxis that had no meters too. Years ago, I had occasion to take a cab in Washington DC, and they looked up their rates on a printed sheet. There was no meter, just a flat rate that you knew as soon as you got into the car. Sound familiar?
The only difference I can see between them and a taxi, is that they cannot be flagged down on the street. They are tied to the app for their income.
The thing that ticks me off about this business model is the sense of entitlement, that they are just too fucking precious to have to assume the responsibility for anyone or anything other than themselves, or to follow laws that everyone else has to follow.
Tweet
Monday, January 27, 2014
Rep Thompson shows no courage of convictions, or perhaps just no convictions
As were many others, I was pretty pissed off when I read the leaked documents fro the Trans-Pacific Partnership negotiations. And I made sure that my representative knew about it. Of course I knew that at best I would get a canned response. I just hoped it would actually address at least of little of the more egregious issued revealed in the document. Instead, this is what I got.
Thank you for contacting me regarding Trade Promotion Authority (TPA) and the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). I appreciate you taking the time to share your concerns with me on these issues.
Thank you for contacting me regarding Trade Promotion Authority (TPA) and the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). I appreciate you taking the time to share your concerns with me on these issues.
TPA, informally known as "fast track,"
is the process by which Congress authorizes the President to negotiate a
trade agreement on its behalf. In exchange for following specific
negotiating and consultation requirements in the TPA law, the President
may submit a final trade agreement to Congress for approval by an
up-down vote. However, in 2007, the law authorizing TPA expired, and as a
result any new trade agreement negotiated by the President will now be
subject to debate and modification by Congress before any agreement
could be approved.
Meanwhile, the TPP is a proposed
regional trade agreement being negotiated between the United States and
eleven other nations. Negotiations cover a wide range of issues,
including intellectual property rights, services, government
procurement, investment, rules of origin, competition, labor, and
environmental standards. In many cases, the rules being negotiated are
intended to be more rigorous than comparable rules established by the
World Trade Organization (WTO). Some topics, such as state-owned
enterprises, regulatory coherence, and supply chain competitiveness,
break new ground in negotiations.
As we face an increasingly globalized
world and economy, I believe balanced, two-way trade must be a tool in
our toolbox of economic growth and expansion. Promoting American exports
and eliminating barriers to trade in foreign countries will help us
create good-paying jobs at home and grow our economy. However, in the
past, many trade agreements that have been submitted for Congressional
consideration have included inadequate labor and environmental
provisions.
Before a final TPP agreement would be
sent to Congress for approval, it is expected that Congress would need
to first re-authorize TPA. To date, no TPA legislation has been
introduced in either the House of Representatives or the United States
Senate. However, before Congress should even consider new TPA
legislation, such a proposal must include incentives to keep well-paying
jobs at home, promote innovation and job creation, strengthen our trade
laws and enforcement agencies, and incorporate strong labor and
environmental negotiating goals.
Please know, as a senior member of the
House Committee on Ways and Means, which is charged with reviewing all
matters relating to trade, I will review any proposed TPA or
trade agreement with a sharp eye and concern for safety, labor, and
environmental protections. TPA and any trade agreements must include
incentives to help keep well-paying jobs at home, and to help spur new
American innovation and job creation across all sectors of our economy.
Rest assured I will keep your thoughts
in mind should any legislation or agreement regarding TPA and TPP come
before the Committee or the House of Representatives for consideration.
Again, thank you for sharing your
thoughts with me. Please continue to contact me on all issues of
importance to you and to our district.
Note the presumption that the only way the treaty can be submitted is if the president is granted fast-track authority, tying the hands of Congress (and the people) from having any input into the document. Note also, despite specifics being available on the content of the proposed agreement he has carefully avoided any mention of them, so he can avoid actually taking a position. No mention of how the top executives of the corporations that will benefit from this (to the detriment of most of us) have seen copies of the text, but he as a 'senior member of the House Committee on Ways and Means' has not.
Would somebody primary this guy from the left, please?
Tweet
Note the presumption that the only way the treaty can be submitted is if the president is granted fast-track authority, tying the hands of Congress (and the people) from having any input into the document. Note also, despite specifics being available on the content of the proposed agreement he has carefully avoided any mention of them, so he can avoid actually taking a position. No mention of how the top executives of the corporations that will benefit from this (to the detriment of most of us) have seen copies of the text, but he as a 'senior member of the House Committee on Ways and Means' has not.
Would somebody primary this guy from the left, please?
Tweet
Tuesday, December 10, 2013
A different approach to ending fracking in California
Water is a big, big, issue in California. Agriculture and residential use have been battling for years. It takes a lot of water to make the desert bloom.
We no longer draw the water we used to from the Colorado river, and the snow pack in the Sierras has been declining. Reservoirs are frequently not getting refilled during the winter months. California does not have an endless supply of fresh water. Now there is another player in the game, and that is Hydraulic Fracturing.
Much of the truth of the damage caused by Fracking is hidden behind settlement agreements that forbid the victims from revealing the injuries to their property and their bodies. If you go here you can see quite a number of documented cases. While I would not Fracking anywhere near water I was going to use to drink, or that would be used to water crops, that is not the issue I am addressing here.
California simply cannot afford to divert their shirking water supply away from agriculture and human consumption. Much of California is in fact desert. So here is my suggestion.
We need a ballot initiative that fresh water may not be diverted for the purposes of Hydraulic Fracturing in the state of California. Any water used for that purpose must be desalinized sea water. I specify desalinized because we do not want all of that salt injected into our groundwater (the evidence is clear that the water does end up in people's wells, and the money they have paid out to shut people up should be enough proof to convince any sane person).
So if they want to Frack, let them get their own water. Simple.
Now, who knows how to get a measure like this on the ballot?
Tweet
We no longer draw the water we used to from the Colorado river, and the snow pack in the Sierras has been declining. Reservoirs are frequently not getting refilled during the winter months. California does not have an endless supply of fresh water. Now there is another player in the game, and that is Hydraulic Fracturing.
Much of the truth of the damage caused by Fracking is hidden behind settlement agreements that forbid the victims from revealing the injuries to their property and their bodies. If you go here you can see quite a number of documented cases. While I would not Fracking anywhere near water I was going to use to drink, or that would be used to water crops, that is not the issue I am addressing here.
California simply cannot afford to divert their shirking water supply away from agriculture and human consumption. Much of California is in fact desert. So here is my suggestion.
We need a ballot initiative that fresh water may not be diverted for the purposes of Hydraulic Fracturing in the state of California. Any water used for that purpose must be desalinized sea water. I specify desalinized because we do not want all of that salt injected into our groundwater (the evidence is clear that the water does end up in people's wells, and the money they have paid out to shut people up should be enough proof to convince any sane person).
So if they want to Frack, let them get their own water. Simple.
Now, who knows how to get a measure like this on the ballot?
Tweet
Sunday, November 17, 2013
The 'Independent Contractor' scam and a return to 19th Century values
For better than 20 years I have been a one-man business. I have a corporation with one shareholder and one employee, and they are the same person. I sell my time by the hour and I have done quite well for myself.
My client writes a check to my company for my services. My company writes me a paycheck with all the appropriate taxes withheld. My current client has certain stipulations in their standard contract, requiring my company to pay any employees a living wage, to offer health insurance, the sorts of things that responsible companies do for their employees.
But there is a flip side to all this, another side of the 'independent contractor' world. That is the world where that label is used to absolve a business of any responsibility, pay a sub-minimum wage, and essentially treat the people who work for them, who are generating their income, as disposable pieces of equipment.
A number of years ago, we took in a foster child. He is 24 years old now, and has recently returned. He was out of work and we are letting him stay while he gets on his feet. He took a job for Postmates, a delivery service in San Francisco (and elsewhere). He delivers stuff all over the city on a bicycle. Except, it isn't exactly a job, he is considered and 'Independent Contractor'.
In order to work for them, you have to use their app. It only runs on the iPhone, so if you don't have one they will lease you one. They set the prices, not the riders. In order to get any work, you have to commit to specific times. If you have not committed to a specific time slot it is unlikely their software will offer you any deliveries. They, on the other hand make no commitment to you on any particular amount of work. His best days was a little over $129 working about 12 hours. His worst was a big zero.
Should you be injured on the job, well that's your problem. And if you should die at it (cyclists do get killed in the city), I am sure they will say all the right things as they wash their hands of the situation. You see, they expect loyalty, but that loyalty is one-sided.
Oh, and just to add insult to injury, they pay by EFT only, and then charge their riders for the transfer. Yes, it is a small charge, but if they were employees that would be illegal. At least in the state of California it would be, they also operate in a couple of other locations.
As I think about the arrangement, the working conditions of 19th century coal miners comes to mind. No they were not considered independent contractors, but the mine owners had the same level of concern for their employees, the same attitude, that this business model does. Management controls the working conditions, while the workers take the risks. Unlike the coal miners, their workers take both the physical risk, and the financial risk
Tweet
My client writes a check to my company for my services. My company writes me a paycheck with all the appropriate taxes withheld. My current client has certain stipulations in their standard contract, requiring my company to pay any employees a living wage, to offer health insurance, the sorts of things that responsible companies do for their employees.
But there is a flip side to all this, another side of the 'independent contractor' world. That is the world where that label is used to absolve a business of any responsibility, pay a sub-minimum wage, and essentially treat the people who work for them, who are generating their income, as disposable pieces of equipment.
A number of years ago, we took in a foster child. He is 24 years old now, and has recently returned. He was out of work and we are letting him stay while he gets on his feet. He took a job for Postmates, a delivery service in San Francisco (and elsewhere). He delivers stuff all over the city on a bicycle. Except, it isn't exactly a job, he is considered and 'Independent Contractor'.
In order to work for them, you have to use their app. It only runs on the iPhone, so if you don't have one they will lease you one. They set the prices, not the riders. In order to get any work, you have to commit to specific times. If you have not committed to a specific time slot it is unlikely their software will offer you any deliveries. They, on the other hand make no commitment to you on any particular amount of work. His best days was a little over $129 working about 12 hours. His worst was a big zero.
Should you be injured on the job, well that's your problem. And if you should die at it (cyclists do get killed in the city), I am sure they will say all the right things as they wash their hands of the situation. You see, they expect loyalty, but that loyalty is one-sided.
Oh, and just to add insult to injury, they pay by EFT only, and then charge their riders for the transfer. Yes, it is a small charge, but if they were employees that would be illegal. At least in the state of California it would be, they also operate in a couple of other locations.
As I think about the arrangement, the working conditions of 19th century coal miners comes to mind. No they were not considered independent contractors, but the mine owners had the same level of concern for their employees, the same attitude, that this business model does. Management controls the working conditions, while the workers take the risks. Unlike the coal miners, their workers take both the physical risk, and the financial risk
Tweet
Thursday, October 31, 2013
Small victories
I have written from time to time about driving the casual carpool. This happened yesterday.
I had a full car, and was on the carpool only on-ramp. A few car lengths ahead I saw someone stop, and try to force themselves into the left hand (the on-ramp has two lanes, that merge at the very top) lane. It held up traffic for a bit, until the driver managed to stick his nose between two cars, and make everyone wait until the lane change was accomplished.
There is no good reason to be changing lanes there, they are going to merge soon anyway. Except, it was a solo driver on the carpool on-ramp, and a highway patrolman was parked near the top of the ramp. The driver was trying to make it more difficult to be seen.
Shortly after, the highway patrolman was walking between the lanes of traffic. This was not a dangerous maneuver, the traffic was stop and go. He signaled to the right hand lane to stop, creating a gap. He pointed to the solo driver, signaling for him to turn into the hole created by the stopped traffic, and pull over.
We passed the car as the patrolman was at the car window, explaining to the driver the error of his ways. We all cheered as we drove by.
Tweet
I had a full car, and was on the carpool only on-ramp. A few car lengths ahead I saw someone stop, and try to force themselves into the left hand (the on-ramp has two lanes, that merge at the very top) lane. It held up traffic for a bit, until the driver managed to stick his nose between two cars, and make everyone wait until the lane change was accomplished.
There is no good reason to be changing lanes there, they are going to merge soon anyway. Except, it was a solo driver on the carpool on-ramp, and a highway patrolman was parked near the top of the ramp. The driver was trying to make it more difficult to be seen.
Shortly after, the highway patrolman was walking between the lanes of traffic. This was not a dangerous maneuver, the traffic was stop and go. He signaled to the right hand lane to stop, creating a gap. He pointed to the solo driver, signaling for him to turn into the hole created by the stopped traffic, and pull over.
We passed the car as the patrolman was at the car window, explaining to the driver the error of his ways. We all cheered as we drove by.
Tweet
Monday, October 14, 2013
A perfectly good electric motor
We use airbeds in our home. I don't sleep on one, but we do keep two or three around.
Between children and grandchildren, family gatherings can be a lot of people. More people than we have beds and couches for. I think for a few days in late spring there were twelve or thirteen extra people in the house. So out come the airbeds.
I have successfully patched airbeds with a leak, but kids just seem to have this deep seated need to make new leaks. I have one of those right next to me. It is fully inflated, standing up against a wall, unwilling to reveal where the latest (I have patched it twice previously) leak might be. I think this one is toast.
And that brings me back to the question I have been pondering. What to do with the pump?
It is a perfectly good pump, probably designed to last much longer than bed itself. It seems like there should be something to be done with it, that it could be re-purposed is some way.
I have a treasure chest full of cables and electronic components of one sort or another that I keep, I suppose it could go in there. But everything in there I have an idea of what I could use it for. The pump? Not a clue.
I have tried a few different google searches, and so far all the results have been about the PVC that most airbeds are made from, and the difficulty of recycling that. It seems like there should be some useful purpose for a perfectly goods electric pump.
Tweet
Between children and grandchildren, family gatherings can be a lot of people. More people than we have beds and couches for. I think for a few days in late spring there were twelve or thirteen extra people in the house. So out come the airbeds.
I have successfully patched airbeds with a leak, but kids just seem to have this deep seated need to make new leaks. I have one of those right next to me. It is fully inflated, standing up against a wall, unwilling to reveal where the latest (I have patched it twice previously) leak might be. I think this one is toast.
And that brings me back to the question I have been pondering. What to do with the pump?
It is a perfectly good pump, probably designed to last much longer than bed itself. It seems like there should be something to be done with it, that it could be re-purposed is some way.
I have a treasure chest full of cables and electronic components of one sort or another that I keep, I suppose it could go in there. But everything in there I have an idea of what I could use it for. The pump? Not a clue.
I have tried a few different google searches, and so far all the results have been about the PVC that most airbeds are made from, and the difficulty of recycling that. It seems like there should be some useful purpose for a perfectly goods electric pump.
Tweet
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)